Filter publications
Automated Measurement of Volumetric Mammographic Density: A Tool for Widespread Breast Cancer Risk Assessment
Brand, Czene, Shepherd, Leifland, Heddson, Sundbom, Eriksson, Li, Humphreys, Hall
“Percent and absolute dense volumes as obtained with Volpara are associated with established determinants of mammographic density as well as breast cancer risk… our results suggest that automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density can be used as part of screening programs to provide risk and masking information that could be used to alter woman’s clinical management…”
Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
Wanders, Holland, Veldhuis, Mann, Pijnappel, Peeters, van Gils, Karssemeijer
“Volumetric mammographic density, automatically measured on digital mammograms, impacts screening performance measures along the same patterns as established with ACR breast density categories.”
Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands
van der Waal, Emaus, Bakker, den Heeten, Karssemeijer, Pijnappel, Veldhuis, Verbeek, van Gils, Broeders
“There appears to be geographic variation in mammographic density in the Netherlands, emphasizing the importance of including breast density as parameter in the evaluation of screening performance.”
Differences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysis
Rajaram, Mariapun, Eriksson, Tapia, Kwan, Ho, Harun, Rahmat, Czene, Taib, Hall, Teo
“Variation in dense volume for post-menopausal Asian and Caucasian women reflects population differences in breast cancer risk, and these are attributed to differences in height, weight, and parity. Further research is needed to identity a suitable mammographic density measure as a biomarker for breast cancer risk among pre-menopausal Asian women.”
Increased peri-ductal collagen micro-organization may contribute to raised mammographic density
McConnell, O'Connell, Brennan, Weiping, Howe, Joseph, Knight, O'Cualain, Lim, Leek, Waddington, Rogan, Astley, Gandhi, Kirwan, Sherratt, Streuli
“These preliminary data suggest that remodelling, and hence stiffening, of the existing stromal collagen microarchitecture promotes high mammographic density within the breast. In turn, this aberrant mechanical environment may trigger neoplasia-associated mechanotransduction pathways within the epithelial cell population”
Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study
Lundberg, Johansson, Rodroguez-Wallberg, Brand, Czene, Hall, Iliadou
“Women with a history of infertility had higher absolute dense volume than other women. Among the infertile women, those who had gone through COS [controlled ovarian stimulation] had the highest absolute dense volume.”
Volumetric breast density measurement: sensitivity analysis of a relative physics approach
Lau, Ng, Aziz
“Volpara was robust to expected clinical variations, with errors in most investigated parameters giving limited changes in results…”
Automated volumetric breast density estimation: A comparison with visual assessment
Seo, Ko, Han, Ko, Shin, Hahn
“VBD showed a highly significant positive correlation with visual assessment… Automated VBD is a reliable objective method to measure breast density.”
Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists’ visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them
Lee, Sohn, Han
“Therefore, the use of automated software may help provide higher reproducibility, especially for patients with different bilateral breast densities… In conclusion, automated volumetric breast density measurement shows good agreement of BI-RADS density category as a quantitative method.”
Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment
Holland, Zelst, Heeten, Imhof-Tas, Mann, Gils, Karssemeijer
“The categorization of serial mammograms in density classes is more consistent with automated software than with a mixed group of human readers. When using breast density to personalize screening protocols, assessment with software may be preferred over assessment by radiologists.”